A Response to “Iran Bombing Threat” – by Ray Roberts

Read Chris Iosso’s article as published on Unbound

In this fine piece Iosso sorts through the rumors of war cir­cu­lat­ing among us.

Since this whole topic is wrapped in intense emo­tion, it is worth repeat­ing a num­ber of truths: First, Mah­moud Ahmadinejad’s repeated holo­caust denials and threats against Israel are abhor­rent and cause for con­cern. Sec­ond, Pres­by­te­ri­ans have rightly and repeat­edly affirmed Israel’s right to peace­ful exis­tence, even as we have also added a call for jus­tice for Pales­tini­ans. Finally, we should be con­cerned about nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion and its poten­tial for stim­u­lat­ing regional arms races (think how Pak­istan and India have rat­tled their nuclear sabers against one another) and worse, the pos­si­bil­ity of nuclear mate­r­ial get­ting into the hands of non-state actors (terrorists).

That said, Iosso help­fully points to how rhetoric com­ing from both Amer­i­can polit­i­cal par­ties is cre­at­ing a mind­set that may box us in and limit America’s abil­ity to act respon­si­bly. It is unclear to me (and other ana­lysts) that a nuclearly armed Iran nec­es­sar­ily poses an exis­ten­tial threat to Israel. We lived for 40 years with a much more heav­ily armed Soviet Union. The pos­si­bil­ity of mutu­ally assured destruc­tion, dis­taste­ful and morally prob­lem­atic as that was, lim­ited even the use of con­ven­tional weapons cre­at­ing a cold war.

That said, it is clearly prefer­able for Iran not gain nuclear arms. Yet, some ana­lysts, like Stephen Walt, worry that our cur­rent strat­egy may be per­versely push­ing Iran to secure nuclear arms (as a way to pre­vent con­ven­tional attacks) and that an attack could have the unin­ten­tional effect (as it did after Israel attacked Iraq) of solid­i­fy­ing their resolve.

As we try to get a fair grasp of what’s going on, it is worth con­sid­er­ing that impor­tant voices within Israel dis­sent from the “mind­set.” For exam­ple, for­mer Mossad chief Meir Dagan has called air strikes against Iran stu­pid. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/former-mossad-chief-israel-air-strike-on-iran-stupidest-thing-i-have-ever-heard-1.360367 Ehud Barak ques­tions whether Iran rep­re­sents the threat that some on the right claim. http://www.haaretz.com/news/report-barak-says-iran-is-not-existential-threat-to-israel-1.7710

As Amer­i­can Chris­tians, who seek first the King­dom of God, we should seek peace among the nations. We should con­tinue to sup­port Israel’s right to peace and secu­rity and jus­tice for Pales­tini­ans. In par­tic­u­lar we should note how Iran exploits Pales­tin­ian griev­ances and how address­ing these griev­ances would ben­e­fit Israel’s secu­rity. We should also, wher­ever pos­si­ble, work to decrease weapons and hos­til­ity between nations that could erupt into war, par­tic­u­larly we should work to decrease the pro­lif­er­a­tion of nuclear weapons, approach­ing our call­ing as wisely as ser­pents and inno­cently as doves. One of the best ways for the church to respond, at least right now, is to be actively engag­ing our mem­bers in enlight­ened con­ver­sa­tion on this dif­fi­cult topic.

This last sug­ges­tion con­nects with an impor­tant point Iosso makes at the close of his arti­cle, wherein he notes that denom­i­na­tional lead­ers proved their wis­dom in their oppo­si­tion to the Iraq War. While I com­pletely agree with his assess­ment, I note that hardly any­body at the time con­sid­ered what main­line reli­gious lead­ers said to be rel­e­vant. It was a faith­ful wit­ness, but not very effec­tive. Why? My sense is that protests from main­line reli­gious lead­ers before the Iraq War largely fell on deaf ears because they spoke with­out a con­stituency. (In 2002, for exam­ple, the Pres­by­ter­ian Panel found that only 44% of mem­bers thought going to war in Iraq was a bad idea.) This con­trasts with the reli­gious right whose ground work has given them a voice that can­not be ignored.

All of this is to say that the mind­set that Iosso names must also be addressed in the church.

The Reverend Dr. Raymond R. Roberts is the senior pastor of the Presbyterian Church in Westfield, NJ. After graduating from Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri, he attended Columbia Theological Seminary in Decatur, Georgia. In 1999, he earned a Ph.D. In History and Theology from Union Theological Seminary in Virginia. He is the author of the book, “Whose Kids Are They Anyway? Religion and Morality in America’s Public Schools.” Ray is an active member of the Society of Christian Ethics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.